Agent Communication Protocols
Learn how AI agents exchange information and coordinate actions
Your Progress
0 / 5 completedWhy Standards Matter
Communication standards ensure that agents from different developers, frameworks, and organizations can work together. Without standards, every system would speak its own "language," making interoperability impossible.
Interactive: Protocol Comparison Tool
Compare different agent communication protocols:
FIPA (Foundation for Intelligent Physical Agents)
Industry standard for multi-agent systems
📅 Created: 1996👥 Used by: Enterprise systems, JADE framework, commercial agents
Key Features:
✓22 standard performatives
✓Strict message format
✓Interaction protocols defined
✓Ontology support built-in
Advantages:
- +Industry standard
- +Interoperable
- +Comprehensive
Disadvantages:
- −Complex to implement
- −Rigid structure
- −Heavy overhead
Protocol Selection Guide
FIPA
When: Building enterprise systems that need interoperability with existing agents. Using frameworks like JADE.
Custom JSON
When: Building modern LLM-based agents, microservices, or systems where you control all agents. Need flexibility and speed.
ACL
When: Research projects, prototyping, or educational purposes. Want a simple starting point.
KQML
When: Working with legacy systems or knowledge-based agents. Rarely used in new projects.
🎯 Best Practices
- •Choose based on ecosystem: Use FIPA if working with JADE/other FIPA agents
- •Favor simplicity for modern systems: JSON protocols work well for LLM agents
- •Document your protocol: If custom, create clear specs for developers
- •Version your messages: Include protocol version for backward compatibility