Home/Agentic AI/Agent Limitations/Practical Application

Agent Limitations

Understand constraints and design for reliability in AI agent systems

Limitation-Aware Architecture

Real production systems that embrace limitations and design around them. Learn from companies building reliable agents at scale.

πŸ“– Production Case Studies

Select an example to see how real systems handle agent limitations

GitHub Copilot: Constrained Autocomplete

Limitation Embraced: Hallucination

Strategy: Treat output as "suggestions," not "answers." User remains in control, reviews every line before accepting.

Design Decision: Tab to accept, Esc to reject. Makes human review friction-free. No auto-commit to codebase.
Limitation Embraced: Context Limits

Strategy: Only include nearby files in context (~20 files, not entire repo). Prioritize open tabs and imports.

Design Decision: Optimize for 90% common cases. For cross-repo references, rely on user knowledge.
Limitation Embraced: Cost

Strategy: Debounce requests (wait 100ms after typing stops). Cache similar completions. Use smaller models where possible.

Result: ~$10/month per user sustainable even with heavy usage.

πŸ—οΈ Core Design Patterns

1. Human-in-the-Loop

Don't automate end-to-end. Put humans at decision points. Show diffs, require approval for risky actions.

2. Tiered Models

Cheap models for simple tasks, expensive for complex. Let users choose quality vs. speed trade-off.

3. Constrained Scope

Narrow task definitions prevent failure modes. "Fix typos" > "Improve writing" > "Write essay."

4. Resource Budgets

Hard limits on tokens, time, iterations. Prevent runaway costs and infinite loops.

πŸ’‘ The Pattern

Notice what these successful systems have in common: They don't fight limitationsβ€”they design around them.

Copilot doesn't try to prevent hallucination; it makes reviewing suggestions effortless. Cursor doesn't solve context limits; it gives users control. Notion doesn't achieve 100% accuracy; it constrains tasks to where 90% is good enough.