The Global Restoration Opportunity

Can we restore 900 million hectares?

The Numbers

Global assessment: 2 billion hectares of degraded or deforested land. Not all suitable for restoration—some now cities, farms, deserts. Technically feasible potential: ~900 million hectares (Mha) could support forest regrowth. For scale: that's area of USA + China combined. IPCC estimates this could sequester 200-300 GtCO₂ over 30 years—equivalent to 5-10% of emissions reductions needed for 1.5°C pathway.

Tropical regions hold largest potential. Amazon, Congo Basin, SE Asia account for ~450 Mha of opportunity. High rainfall, fast growth rates, degraded land from logging/agriculture. But also highest deforestation pressure—restoring while preventing new clearing is the challenge. Success stories: Costa Rica increased forest cover from 26% (1980s) to 60% (2020s) through payments for ecosystem services and tourism revenue.

Costs vary widely by region and method. Natural regeneration in tropics: $50-200/ha. Active planting in temperate zones: $500-2,000/ha. Agroforestry in developing regions: $1,000-3,000/ha. Total to restore 900 Mha at average $300/ha = $270 billion. For comparison: global fossil fuel subsidies exceed $600 billion/year. Carbon credit revenue at $50/tCO₂ could cover 30-50% of costs.

Co-benefits often exceed carbon value. Forests prevent $1+ trillion in flood damages annually, support livelihoods for 1.6 billion people, provide habitat for 80% of terrestrial biodiversity, regulate local rainfall, purify water supplies. In Brazil, forest restoration increases agricultural productivity downwind through rainfall recycling. In China, reforestation reduced sediment in Yellow River by 90%, saving billions in dredging costs.

Interactive Global Restoration Mapper

Explore regional potential and scale restoration scenarios

Restoration Target

30%
0% (No action)50% (Ambitious)100% (Maximum)
Global Total: 2000 Mha degraded land,900 Mha technically restorable
🌳
270 Mha
Area Restored
(667M acres)
🌱
275.3 Gt
CO₂ Removed
(over 30 years)
💰
$90B
Total Investment
($0/tCO₂)
📊
743.9%
Annual Emissions
(averaged over 30 yrs)

Real-World Scale

🏞️
Area Comparison
270 Mha = 0.33× size of India
👨‍🌾
Jobs Created
~1350 million jobs (5 jobs/100 ha avg)
💧
Water Benefits
Regulates flow for ~2700M people downstream
🦋
Biodiversity
Habitat for 270000 endangered species

Major Global Initiatives

🇺🇳
UN Decade on Ecosystem Restoration (2021-2030)

Goal: 350 Mha restored by 2030. Includes Bonn Challenge pledge (350 Mha) and AFR100 (African Forest Landscape Restoration, 100 Mha).

🌳
Trillion Trees Initiative

Coalition of WWF, BirdLife, WCS. Target: protect and restore 1 trillion trees globally. Current: ~3 trillion trees exist (down from 6 trillion historically).

🌍
Great Green Wall (Africa)

Restore 100 Mha across Sahel from Senegal to Djibouti (8,000 km). Combat desertification, create jobs, sequester 250 Mt CO₂/year when complete.

🇨🇳
China's Green Great Wall

World's largest afforestation program. 66 billion trees planted since 1978. Reduced sandstorms in Beijing, but some monoculture issues and water stress concerns.

⚠️ Critical Constraints
  • Land availability: Compete with food production, urbanization, renewable energy siting
  • Water limitations: Many degraded lands are water-scarce; afforestation can worsen droughts
  • Fire risk: Climate change increases fire frequency, reversing carbon gains
  • Permanence: Requires 50-100 year protection; political instability, funding gaps threaten longevity
  • Leakage: Protecting one forest may shift deforestation elsewhere (displacement)
  • Albedo effect: Dark boreal forests absorb more sunlight than snow/grassland, potentially warming locally

💡 Key Insight

Afforestation alone won't solve climate change—but it's essential. Even full 900 Mha restoration only offsets 2-3 years of current global emissions. Must combine with: (1) rapid fossil fuel phase-out, (2) agricultural intensification to spare land, (3) protecting existing forests (preventing deforestation = immediate impact), (4) other CDR methods. Think of it as buying time while decarbonizing economy. Nature-based solutions provide fastest, cheapest near-term removals while engineered CDR scales up.

← Previous