Previous Module
Product Roles

Choosing the Right Team Structure

Compare structures and learn proven models from top companies

Evaluating Team Structures

There's no universally "best" team structure—each has trade-offs. The right choice depends on your product complexity, company stage, and strategic priorities. Understanding these trade-offs helps you make informed decisions.

Compare Structures Across Dimensions

See how different structures perform on key dimensions:

🎯

Ownership Clarity

Feature Teams

Crystal clear—each team owns specific features

Journey Teams

Clear, but boundaries can overlap

Component Teams

Owns tech, but not end-to-end user value

Matrix Teams

Shared ownership creates confusion

Proven Team Models

Learn from successful models used by top companies:

Spotify Model

Squads, tribes, chapters, and guilds

Squad

Small cross-functional team (PM, Designer, Engineers)

Purpose: Build and own features end-to-end

Tribe

Collection of squads working on related area

Purpose: Coordinate on shared goals and dependencies

Chapter

People with same discipline across squads

Purpose: Share knowledge, set standards (e.g., all designers)

Guild

Interest group across the company

Purpose: Share learnings on topics like accessibility, testing

Advantages:

  • +Clear autonomy at squad level
  • +Knowledge sharing through chapters
  • +Scales to large orgs

Trade-offs:

  • -Can be complex
  • -Risk of duplication
  • -Requires strong culture

Note: Works best at 50+ people

When to Use Each Structure

🎯 Choose Feature Teams If:

  • • You have distinct, independent features
  • • Speed of iteration is critical
  • • You want clear ownership and accountability

🚶 Choose Journey Teams If:

  • • User experience consistency is paramount
  • • You're optimizing conversion funnels
  • • You have clear stages in user lifecycle

🏗️ Add Platform Teams If:

  • • You have 5+ product teams
  • • Duplication is slowing everyone down
  • • Common infrastructure needs emerge
💡

Structure Follows Strategy

Don't copy structure from successful companies blindly. What works for Spotify with 2,000 engineers won't work for your 20-person startup. Choose structure based on YOUR strategic priorities, stage, and constraints. And remember: structure isn't permanent—evolve it as you grow.

Key Takeaways

  • Evaluate structures on: ownership clarity, speed, UX consistency, scalability
  • Proven models: Spotify (squads/tribes), Amazon (two-pizza), Pod model
  • Feature teams for speed, Journey teams for UX, Platform teams at scale
  • Structure follows strategy—choose based on YOUR context, not what's trendy